Left
Inertia in the Supply Chain
Monday 21st May 2012
Right
Inertia

The Chart

Shows the service level, average and peak stock and shelf size impacts, at one rate of sale, of replen lead times from 1 through 10 days
Also shows the controls used to browse different rate of sale and/or target service levels

Originally published by Cranfield in 2003

gap
   

Inertia and Momentum in Supply Chains #2

We illustrate the simplest case: The store is replenished with singles through a BTL (Build To Level), i.e. the on shelf + in transit quantity is 'topped up' by the DC to the BTL. Under steady state this settles down to SOGO, (or 'sell one, get one') which stays constant throughout. The DC always has enough stock. The store sells the same total amount week after week, and the lead time of resupply (DC >> store) is constant.

In the real world, everything is worse than this. Almost 60% of all sales take place on Fri/Sat/Sun; BTL's change like the weather; cheap items come in box quantities, the warehouse shuts at the weekend so lead times go out, and so on. No matter, the purpose of this paper is to illustrate some fundamental truths about supply chain momentum. However alarming those results might be, in the real world things are worse. However large the opportunities under steady state, in the real world they are larger.

Configuring and running the tools

The tools are taken from the General Retail Model Suite, with capabilities including the trade off between service level and lead time, between lead time and inventory, between rate of sale and inventory or lead time or service level, between box quantity and service level, 7 day or 'skip day(s)' deliveries, shelf space and sales and so on.

Most of these are step relationships - at a fixed rate of sale and lead time the service level at a BTL of one might be 92% whereas at a BTL of 2 it might be 99%. There's no such thing as a BTL of 1.2 items![1]

In the past that meant it was difficult to compare like with like … there was no obvious way to hold the service level constant and look at the inventory vs. service level trade off. GRMS now contains proprietary methods to bridge the gap, although these runs are on the earlier (integer) model. For that reason the illustrated rate of sale is higher than usual … at higher rates of sale the step increase in service level (between anyBTL and anyBTL+1) is smaller than at low rates of sale.

Method

We ran a GRMS tool at a range of rates of sale, lead time and inventory. The tool mirrors a real supply chain, so sales fluctuate about an average. Because sales of each SKU vary through pure chance and the BTL (on-shelf plus on-way) remains a constant the resultant on-shelf stock varies. With a one week lead time the on-shelf stock today is a consequence of yesterday's sales (luck, good or bad), the day before's sales (more luck) and so on.

  1. In passing, the conversion of decimal sales forecasts to integer BTLs is an area fraught with misunderstandings.

If Gladstone fell in the Thames, that would be a misfortune; and if anybody pulled him out, that would be a calamity. Disraeli
Home | About Us | Showcase | Research | Cases | The Vaults | Tips & Quips | Contact Us …
© 2002 - 2012 Supply Chain Tools Ltd.